The interview occurred before that year's All Japan Championships. Edo sensei recognised Miyazaki Masahiro's strength and predicted his victory. Edo sensei himself belonged to kendo's first post-war generation, winning third place in his 1961 debut. He sees parallels between Miyazaki and himself — both catalysts for change, alongside contemporaries such as Kuwahara Tetsuaki (21, prior-year winner) and Toda Tadao (23, following-year winner).
Since Miyazaki's victory, the kendo world has shifted in a positive direction. Before, only large, powerful players won. Miyazaki, of average build, triumphs through technique, strategy and tactics — his hallmark is speed. He is a fast-attacking type who strikes at a fast tempo. I believe he retains his winning potential!
Yamashita Tadanori (Chūkyō University) also shows promise. Nabeyama Takahiro might have thrived over the last ten years, but Miyazaki's rise has altered the kendo world, and Nabeyama's timing now seems not to be good enough.
Powerful champions such as Yamada Hironobu, Nishikawa Kiyonori and Hayashi Akira were formidable, but there is still room for Miyazaki's kendo.
Nostalgia for 'the old days' grows with age, a nostalgia not confined to kendo. Kendo, which is rooted in swordsmanship, risks losing its essence now that swords have become obsolete, and there are certainly problems with this change, not merely nostalgia. While these changes pose challenges, sensei such as Edo sensei, who grew up after the war — especially those who are, or were, instructors at universities and elsewhere — are the ones who calmly grasp the flow of the times and the changes that come with it. Among them, Edo sensei is the one who always thinks about what specific improvements should be made, yet he honours tradition.
For example, Nihon Kendo Kata must be preserved as the cultural heritage. I think deeper research into its essence is fundamental.
Nowadays many kenshi mechanically repeat kata. We must clarify and learn: which school inspired ippon-me? Why jōdan? Why do we aim at kote in ippon-me? Why waki-gamae in yonhon-me? How do all of these relate to practical kendo?
I learned kata from Uekichi Satō sensei, the top disciple of Takano Saburō sensei, during his tenure at Chūkyō University. When I performed ippon-me, he would always snarl, 'Edo-kun, that is wrong.' No matter how many times I did it, he kept saying 'Wrong', keeping the explanation to himself. When sensei was about to retire, he finally told me, 'Edo-kun, I have no choice but to teach you.'
The explanation was simple enough: I stepped back too early. One must draw the opponent in, letting them step in completely without any chance to alter their movement, and only then respond, avoiding their attack. Simple, yet true kata.
Satō sensei would strike yokomen or thrust during nihon-me. He said that it had just so happened that we had agreed to strike kote, but in essence a yokomen strike or a thrust is equally valid. Kata performed under such circumstances and in such a spirit mirrors the pressure of real combat. It loses meaning without practicality. Five or six kata like this during a winter practice drench me entirely. People are often frightened when I perform kata, even with a bokutō.